Subject	Okay that makes better sense, I was going from memory
Posted by	FuerGrissa on May 04, 2009 at 5:52 PM
	This message has been viewed 38 times.
In Reply To	Re: The proper rear jackstand point is not the front subframe posted by ali300zx on May 04, 2009 at 04:14 PM
Message	which was apperantly erroneous. I'm pretty confident the fronts are in a good spot if not the correct one, they havn't deformed anything and they are under the weight more. Going to move the rears though, They defrom the cup shaped bracket that the subrame mounts to if you dont get them lined up perfectly but I didn't see a better spot. I guess looks are decieving but it seemed like putting it under the frame rail would just bend it and deform the floor pan. That bracket shown in the FSM looked kinda flimsy also but I guess that's decieving.
Follow Ups	Great day to get the Z out and take her for a spin! - FuerGrissa 01:48:48 05/04/09 Same thing I do with my Black Z (n/m) - toykoz32 03:28:03 05/04/09 What are your front jackstands supporting? From your pics - Inzane 10:33:36 05/04/09 2nd. It looks like the Cross Member to me. (n/m) - MixManMash 12:48:19 05/04/09 Its right where the lower A-arm meets the crossmember - FuerGrissa 13:45:11 05/04/09 Re: Its right where the lower A-arm meets the crossmember - ali300zx 14:25:27 05/04/09 The proper rear jackstand point is not the front subframe - Inzane 15:40:32 05/04/09 Re: The proper rear jackstand point is not the front subframe - ali300zx 16:14:09 05/04/09 The diagram is correct. Your description was misleading. - Inzane 16:28:56 05/04/09 ah word. (n/m) - ali300zx 16:42:04 05/04/09 Okay that makes better sense, I was going from memory - FuerGrissa 17:52:24 05/04/09
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.